Last September, I detailed why I’d decided to hold onto the first-gen DJI Mavic Air drone that I’d bought back in mid-2021 (and DJI had introduced in January 2018), a decision which then prompted me to both resurrect its long-drained batteries and acquire a Remote ID module to get it copacetic with current FAA usage regulations, as subsequently mentioned in October:
Within both blog posts, however, I intentionally alluded to (but didn’t delve into detail on) the newer drone that I’d also purchased to accompany it, aside from dropping hints that it offered (sneak peek: as-needed enabled) integrated Remote ID support and weighed (sneak peek: sometimes) less than 250 grams. That teasing wasn’t (just) to drive you nuts: to do the topic justice would necessitate a blog post all its own. That time is now, and that blog post is this one.
Behold DJI’s Mini 3 Pro, originally introduced in May 2022 and shown here with its baseline RC-N1 controller:
I bought mine (two of them, actually, as it turned out) roughly two years post-intro, in late June (from eBay) and early July (from Lensrentals) of last year. By that time, the Mini 4 Pro successor, unveiled in September 2023, had already been out for nearly a year. So, why did I pick its predecessor? The two drone generations look identical; they take the same batteries, propellers and other parts, and fit into the same cases. And as far as image capture goes, the sensors are identical as well: 48 Mpixel (effective) 1/1.3″ CMOS.
What’s connected to the image sensors, however, leads to one of several key differences between the two generations. The Mini 3 Pro captures video at up to 4K resolution at a 60-fps peak frame rate. The improved ISP (image signal processor) in the Mini 4 Pro, conversely, also captures video at 4K resolution, but this time up to a 100-fps frame rate. Dim-light image quality is also improved, along with the available capture-format options, now also encompassing both pre-processed HDR and post-processed D-LOG. And the camera now rotates a full 90° vertical for TikTok- and more general smartphone viewing-friendly portrait orientation video frames.
Speaking of cameras, what about the two drones’ collision avoidance systems? The DJI Mini 3 Pro has cameras both front and rear for collision avoidance purposes, along with another pointing downward to (for example) aid in landing. The Mini 4 Pro replaces them with four fisheye-lens cameras (at front, rear and both sides) for collision avoidance all around the drone as well as above it, further augmented by two downward facing cameras for stereo distance and a LiDAR sensor, the latter enhancing after-dark sensing and discerning distance-to-ground when the terrain is featureless. By the way, the rumored upcoming DJI Mini 5 Pro further bolsters the drone’s LiDAR facilities, if the leaked images are true and not just Photoshop-created fakes.
The final notable difference involves the contrasting wireless protocols used by both drones to communicate with and stream live video to the user’s controller and, if used, goggles. The Mini 3 Pro leverages DJI’s O3 transmission system, with an estimated range of 12 km while streaming live 1080p 30 fps video. With the Mini 4 Pro and its more advanced O4 system, conversely, the wirelessly connected range increases to an estimated 20 km. Two important notes here:
- The controllers for the Mini 3 Pro also support the longer-range (15 km) and higher frame rate (1080p 60 fps) O3+ protocol used by larger DJI drones such as the Mavic 3
- Unfortunately, however, the DJI Mini 4 is not backwards compatible with the O3 and O3+ protocols, so although I’ll be able to reuse my batteries and the like if I do a drone-generation upgrade in the future, I’ll need to purchase new controllers and goggles for it.
That all said, why did I still go with the Mini 3 Pro? The core reason was cost. In assessing the available inventory of used drone equipment, the bulk of the options I found were at both ends of the spectrum: either in like-new condition, or egregiously damaged by past accidents. But given that the Mini 3 Pro had been in the market nearly 1.5 years longer, its available used inventory was much more sizeable. I was able to find two pristine Mini 3 Pro examples for a combined price tag less than that of a single like-new (far from brand new) Mini 4 Pro. And the money saved also afforded me the ability to purchase two used upgraded integrated-display controllers, the mainstream RC and high-end RC Pro, the latter running full-blown Android.
Although enhancements such as higher quality video, more advanced object detection and longer range are nice, they’re not essential in my currently elementary use case, particularly counterbalanced against the fiscal savings I obtained by going prior-gen. The DJI Mini 4’s expanded-scope collision avoidance might be useful when flying the drone side-to-side for panning purposes, for example, or through a grove of trees, neither of which I see myself doing much if any of, at least for a while. And considering that after 12 km the drone will probably already be out of sight, combined with the alternative ability to record even higher quality video to local drone microSD storage, O4 transmission system support also isn’t a necessity for me.
Speaking of batteries (plenty of spares which I now also own, along with associated chargers, and refresh-charge them every two months to keep them viable) and range, let’s get to the drone’s earlier-alluded Remote ID facilities. The Mini 3 Pro (therefore also Mini 4 Pro) has two battery options: a standard 2453 mAh model that, as conveniently stamped right on it to answer enforcement agency inquiries, keeps the drone just below the 250-gram threshold:
and a “Plus” 3850 mAh model that weighs ~50% more (121 grams vs 80.5 grams). The DJI Mini 3 Pro has built-in Remote ID support, negating the need for an add-on module (which, if installed, would push total weight above 249 grams, even using a standard battery). But here’s the slick bit; when the drone detects that a standard battery is in use, it disables Remote ID transmission, both because the FAA doesn’t require it and to address user privacy concerns, given that scanning facilities are available to the masses, not just to regulatory and enforcement entities.
I’ve admittedly been too busy post-purchase to use the drone gear much yet, but I’m looking forward to harassing the neighbors 
(kidding!) with it in the future. I’ve also acquired a Goggles Integra set and a RC Motion 2 Controller, both gently used from Lensrentals:
to test out FPV (first-person view) flying, and even a LTE cellular dongle for remote-locale Internet access to the RC Pro controller (unfortunately, such dongles reportedly can’t also be used on the drone itself, at least in the US, for alternative long-range controller connectivity):
And finally, I’ve acquired used examples of the Googles Racing Edition Set (Adorama) and OcuSync Air System (eBay) for the Mavic Air, again for FPV testing purposes:
Stay tuned for more on all of this if (hopefully more accurately, when) I get time to actualize my drone gear testing aspirations. Until then, let me know your thoughts in the comments!
—Brian Dipert is the Editor-in-Chief of the Edge AI and Vision Alliance, and a Senior Analyst at BDTI and Editor-in-Chief of InsideDSP, the company’s online newsletter.
Related Content
- Diagnosing and resuscitating a set of DJI drone batteries
- Teardown: DJI Spark drone
- Oh little drone, how you have grown…
- Drone regulation and electronic augmentation
- Keep your drone flying high with the right circuit protection design
The post The (more) modern drone: Which one(s) do I now own? appeared first on EDN.